Miami University
  HOME SEARCH SITEMAP CONTACTS NEWS SPORTS & EVENTS
ABOUT MIAMI ACADEMICS ADMISSION LIVING AT MIAMI UNIVERSITY OFFICES
Liberal Education
Assessment
First Year Seminars
Liberal Education
Miami Plan Assessment (Program Review)
Miami Plan Courses
New Course
Proposal Forms
Petitioning
Reports
Student Success Plan
Top 25 Project
Workshops
 
Assessing Critical Thinking (ACT) Project

Dr. Susanne Wiedemann, Visiting Assistant Professor, American Studies Program
(ACT III, Spring, 2007)

AMS 101: Introduction to American Studies
Dr. Wiedemann's goal in AMS 101 was to help students to think critically and to understand the context of the messages, meanings, experiences, and ideas that are woven together to define American culture. For this project, Dr. Wiedemannn focused on a short assignment that was the fourth writing assignment of the semester. The expected student learning outcomes for this assigment were:

• To facilitate synthesis of a wide range of perspectives, texts, and experiences
• To explore and extend critical thinking about culture and representational practices
• To differentiate between own opinion and arguments/positions presented in the text
• To recognize and prioritize the most relevant arguments/positions
• To acknowledge contradictions and ambiguities in the different positions

Dr. Wiedemann developed a specific rubric for the short writing assignment as well as a general grading rubric. She handed out the specific rubric with the assignment and also posted both rubrics on blackboard. These rubrics clarified the evaluation criteria for the students and made it easier for Dr. Wiedemann to grade the papers.

When she used the rubrics, Dr. Wiedemann realized the major flaw of the rubric design: the evaluation criteria ranged from excellent to poor. This resulted in a considerable amount of evaluations with the “excellent” or “good” categories checked, even though “excellent” did not necessarily reflect the A and B students’ overall critical thinking ability in a 100-level course. Dr. Wiedemann feels this resulted in a discrepancy between students’ actual analytical thinking abilities and their evaluation on this particular assignment.

Dr. Wiedemann plans to revise the rubric so that it reflects the scale used in the Washington State University rubric (ranging from substantially developed to minimally developed) to avoid this conflict. Based on her ACT experience, Dr. Wiedemann feels rubrics are valuable for adding transparency for the students and “demystifying” the grading process, but she is not convinced that critical thinking can be adequately measured and quantified.

Assignments

Short Writing Assignment

Rubrics

General Writing Rubric

Short Writing Assignment Rubric

Return to Assessing Critical Thinking (ACT) Project


 





Assessment
Welcome Page
Assessment Basics
Assessment Briefs
  Assessment Luncheons
Current Projects
Miami Plan Assessment (Program Review)
Staff