Miami University
  HOME SEARCH SITEMAP CONTACTS NEWS SPORTS & EVENTS
ABOUT MIAMI ACADEMICS ADMISSION LIVING AT MIAMI UNIVERSITY OFFICES
Liberal Education
Assessment
First Year Seminars
Global Miami Plan
 
Liberal Education
Miami Plan Assessment (Program Review)
Miami Plan Courses
New Course
Proposal Forms
Petitioning
Student Success Plan
Top 25 Project
Workshops
 
Assessing Critical Thinking (ACT) Project

Ms. T. Tipper Thomas, Department of English

ENG 112: (In)visibility, Identity, and Reality
Ms. Thomas endeavored to reconstruct a "Soundtrack Assignment" to solicit better critical thinking from students. She has used the Washington University Critical Thinking Rubric in English 112 since last year and she made it clear to students that their grades are based upon the rubric. However, students rarely consulted it and even fewer truly understood it.

The soundtrack assignment was intended to be a scaffold to the final essay for the English Literature and Composition 112 course. This assignment was turned in during week two, after students read the novel Erasure by Percival Everett. The original

soundtrack assignment was created with the goal of getting students to engage with the satirical novel within the novel, which was penned by the protagonist of Erasure . Students were asked to pick six to eight songs that would act as metaphors for the characters and events of the novel Erasure through the novel within the novel. Students did not do well on the original assignment.

For the revised assignment, students picked four songs that acted as metaphors for; 1) a central theme of the novel, as evidenced by the way that Everett structures or represents it towards an audience, 2) Everett's view on the theme, 3) the student's view on the theme, and 4) another possible view on the theme. Categories one and two from the WSU rubric were listed directly on the assignment to serve as visible reminder of how students should connect the content of the novel to the character's identity and events and to the rubric.

Having students identify positions, one at a time and as they branch away from the central issue, helped students to think fully about the continuum of stakeholders in the novel. This was a section that was normally weak in English 112 papers. However, the assignment was still in development by the time it was given to students. Thus, it still could have benefitted from clearer instructions. Ms. Thomas is continuing to work on developing the assignment for later use.

Overall, student responses to the assignment were better than on the original assignment. Ms. Thomas reported that she "now realizes fully that developing critical thinking is better done for these students in small, distinct steps." Ms. Thomas intends to duplicate these critical thinking steps several times in class so that, hopefully, the process becomes instinctual in students, thus building a solid foundation for upper level classes and cross-disciplinary critical thinking.

Revised Assignment

Return to Assessing Critical Thinking (ACT) Project


 





Assessment
Welcome Page
Assessment Basics
  Assessment Tools
The Assessing Critical Thinking (ACT) Project
Miami Plan Assessment (Program Review)