|
Col. Kimble Stohry, Chair and Professor, Aerospace
Studies
(ACT I, Spring, 2005; ACT II, Fall, 2005)
 |
Col. Stohry adapted
the WSU rubric for use in his AES 432, National
Security Affairs and Preparation for Active Duty,
course. This is a capstone course taken
by students who will soon be commissioned.
He kept the categories of the rubric the same
but broke each one down into 6 levels rather than
just 4 and described each level. The rubric
was used by peers to give each other feedback
on a draft of a paper as well as being used by
for the final grading. Col. Stohry received
assessment data back from the peer review (without
names) that he could use to see how the papers
were progressing. He found that the peer
reviews were in general higher on the critical
rubric than his own reviews of the draft papers
were. He saw significant gains in critical
thinking between the draft he reviewed and the
final paper. |
Assignment
Students wrote a 15-25 page paper on any topic
pertaining to the military. The papers had
to meet the criteria for submission to the Air
& Space Power Journal. A quote
from the ASPJ website detailing possible topics
is provided below. The students researched
a topic and prepared a prospectus on which they
received instructor feedback. After continued
research, they prepared a topic sentence outline,
which was critiqued by the instructor with emphasis
on logic flow. Students prepared a draft
of the paper on which they received feedback from
two peers. They had the opportunity to then
revise the paper before submitting it to the instructor
for review. Based on instructor feedback,
students had one more opportunity to revise the
paper before turning it in for final grading.
”The English language ASPJ seeks
well-researched articles from anywhere in the
world that analyze current and future challenges
facing the US Air Force and recommend solutions.
Desired topics include air and space power technology,
doctrine, strategy, organization, theory, and
policy. Innovative or controversial ideas
that are competently supported and responsibly
presented are welcome. Additionally, we’re
always looking for papers about leadership, expeditionary
air and space operations, and effects-based concepts.
We also accept historical articles that examine
history for what it suggests about future air
and space warfare.” Taken from http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/howto1.html
Rubric
Stohry
Rubric |
Return to Assessing
Critical Thinking (ACT) Project
|