|
Dr. Cecilia Shore, Professor, Department of
Psychology
(ACT I, Spring, 2005)
 |
Dr. Shore developed
a multi-stage writing portfolio assignment for
her PSY 332, Child Development, class. Students
“chose one of three topics, stated an initial
opinion, then summarized the main points of a
magazine opinion piece about the issue, then summarized
the pro vs. con arguments presented by the article,
then gave their initial conclusion on the issue,
then discussed the article with others who had
read it and wrote a final conclusion taking into
consideration the group discussion.”
A critical thinking rubric was developed and used
to grade the portfolio. Dr. Shore wanted
to use this semester’s class to get baseline
data on where the students were in their critical
thinking skills so did not do explicit instruction
in the skills evaluated by the rubric. Some
of the skills did arise as they read and discussed
journal articles, but they were not explicitly
linked to the portfolio project. She felt
she learned some very interesting things about
where the student weaknesses were. In addition,
she saw significant improvement on the last part
of the project which occurred after students had
received feedback from her on the earlier parts
and after they had a group discussion with other
students working on the same topic. |
Assignment
Shore
Assignment
Rubric
Shore
Rubric |
Return to Assessing
Critical Thinking (ACT) Project
|