|
Dr. Donna Scarborough, Assistant Professor,
Speech Pathology and Audiology
(ACT IV, Spring, 2008)
 |
SPA
651: Dysphagia, Trachs, and Vents
Multi-level
hierarchical problem solving skills
are critical for graduate students'
successful transition into the workplace.
However, graduate students struggle
with these skills, particularly as
they are confronted with clinical case
studies that are not "textbook" in
nature. Dr. Scarborough hopes to use
case studies in a manner that would
teach a critical thinking process that
would increase students' success, thus
improving their ability to help a variety
of clients.
|
| Using reference materials obtained
from the ACT workshop, Dr. Scarborough created
a rubric that was specifically designed for graduate
students and the steps involved with clinical
case studies. Data was collected from Quiz 1,
Quiz 2, and the Final Exam. Questions
were coded per each "critical
thinking level" and
rough calculations were completed for each student.
Although 11 critical thinking levels were identified
as crucial for the profession, data was collected
only for the following 6 aspects: 1) identifying
the problem, 2) identifying relevant information,
3) qualitative interpretation of evidence, 4)
meaningfully organizing information, 5) complete
analysis, and 6) prioritizing factors. Because
she collected data on multiple quizzes and exams,
Dr. Scarborough was able to track students' critical
thinking development as they progressed through
the course.
As a result of the ACT project, Dr. Scarborough
will be speaking at the SPA graduate school orientation
on the topic of critical thinking
skills and the growth that is expected throughout
the two year program. She has also been asked
to discuss at their Fall 2008 faculty retreat
a mechanism for implementing a similar critical
thinking rubric across all of their graduate
courses. For next year's course, Dr. Scarborough
will modify the rubric to more closely correlate
with the standards implemented by SPA's national
governing body to determine if she can more closely
track critical thinking skills in an objective
manner. Input from the faculty retreat discussions
will also help direct specific changes that can
be made with the rubric.
Rubric
|
Return to Assessing
Critical Thinking (ACT) Project
|