Volume 4 - Issue 3 - 2000


Martha N. Ozawa and Rebecca Y. Kim


Susan Tinsley Gooden

Edward L. Kick and James Fraser

Matthew Hirshberg

Susan Weinger




"The Increasing Income Inequality among Children"

Martha N. Ozawa

Washington University

and

Rebecca Y. Kim

Ohio State University

Abstract: As the proportion of the population of children decreases and the United States is increasingly exposed to global competition, children’s economic well-being will become a major public policy issue. This study investigated the changes in income inequality among children from 1969 to 1979, 1979 to 1989, and 1969 to 1989 and compared them with the changes among adults and elderly people during the same periods. The major findings were that (1) income inequality among children increased at a faster rate than among adult and elderly groups, whether it was measured at the pretransfer stage or the posttransfer stage, and (2) the increased income inequality among children was due, in part, to the declining effectiveness of public income transfers--especially social insurance benefits--in lessening income inequality among children.





"Race and Welfare: Examining Employment Outcomes of White and Black Welfare Recipients"

Susan Tinsley Gooden

Virginia Tech


Abstract: This article examines racial disparities in the employment status of white and black welfare recipients who are participating in a state welfare reform program, the Virginia Initiative for Employment not Welfare (VIEW). Measures of employment status include rate of employment; level of employment; hourly wages and occupation type. This exploratory analysis suggests that black and white welfare recipients with similar human capital do not have similar employment outcomes. These findings suggest that analyzing the employment status of welfare recipients by racial subgroups is an important, understudied dimension of welfare policy.





"An Examination of Support or Non-Support for Affirmative Action, Race-Targeted and Income-Targeted Policies"

Edward L. Kick

Middle Tennessee State University

and

James Fraser

University of Tennesse, Chattanooga


Abstract: Many quantitative studies attempt to identify the causes of public support in America for race-targeted, income-targeted, and affirmative action programs. But results are mixed and the theorized predictors of income-targeting support in particular are rather anemic in their predictive power. We identify several possible conceptual and methodological shortcomings in the literature, and provide an alternative examination based on quantitative and qualitative analysis of data drawn from a convenience sample. The results are revealing and suggest directions for future research.





"Robin Hood Revisited: Theft, Charity, and the Ethics of Inequality"

Matthew Hirshberg

University of Canterbury


Abstract: Poverty is perpetuated by systemic inequalities of wealth and power in mutually reinforcing relationships with predominant belief systems, such as ethical beliefs about the proper use and distribution of wealth. In unequal societies, moral inhibitions against "theft" take precedence over imperatives for "charity." Given the opportunity to transfer wealth through theft and charity, there were few Robin Hoods among the subjects in the two studies reported here. They showed an overwhelming tendency not to steal from the rich and give to the poor. Even when the rich would not miss their money and the poor faced death from starvation, property-protecting ethics were applied over altruistic ethics. Various social psychological explanations for these findings are discussed, some of which are experimentally tested.





"Children’s Perceptions of Class Differences: Worries and Self-Perceptions"

Susan Weinger

Western Michigan University


Abstract: This qualitative study explores middle- and low-income children’s perspectives about the worries and self-perceptions of children from different socioeconomic groups. Projective techniques utilizing photographs of houses representing different income levels were used to interview 24 children between the ages of 5 and 14 in each of the two income categories. Respondents generally expected the poor child to worry about life’s harsh realities, while the worries of the middle-class child would reflect the normal vulnerabilities of childhood. Furthermore, respondents anticipated that self-worth rose along with children’s socioeconomic status.


[ Back to Home Page ]