Center For Writing Excellence

Oliver Mogga

Short Writing Assignment for Students

2005 Workshop on Improving Student Writing

Center for Writing Excellence

Center for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching

INTRODUCTION FOR FACULTY TO THIS SHORT ASSIGNMENT


Strength Through Cultural Diversity (IDS 159)

This interdisciplinary course is a component of The Miami Plan for Liberal Education. It is therefore a course that all undergraduates are required to take before they can graduate from their respective programs.

The two assignments designed during and after a four-day workshop facilitated by the Miami University’s Center for Writing Excellence aim to achieve the broad objectives of the course: To promote understanding of cultural differences; and to apply such understanding to foster respect for differences.

This assignment is short and designed as an in-class group activity. It employs an approach called Debate on Propositions used with permission from Chris M. Anson and Deanna P. Dannels, authors of Using Informal Writing and Speaking to Enhance Learning: Fifteen Strategies. Instructions for the assignment explain how this approach works.

  


 

Purpose of the Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to achieve the broader objectives of the course (IDS 159). These objectives stated broadly are twofold:

  • First, to promote understanding of cultural differences
  • Second, to apply understanding of cultural differences to foster respect for differences

Specific teaching and learning objectives of Debate on Propositions, Anson and Dannels’s approach are threefold:

  • To develop the ability to analyze controversial social issues
  • To enable students become critical thinkers
  • To promote appreciation for different perspectives.

Instructions

Each pair of propositions below consists of dialectical propositions.  Students are required to form teams, which pick a proposition from each pair, and spend ten minutes arguing for or against it in writing.  Take a turn to present their argument(s) to the rest of the class members. The class members then respond to the two opposing views presented by the groups.

Propositions:


Pair One

Proposition One: Affirmative action is certainly a meaningful way to address social inequalities in our society. It is a policy that “encourages those who control the coveted social and technoeconomic positions of society to take positive steps to make such positions available to minorities by giving preference to qualified individual members of minority groups and by seeking out such individuals.  Affirmative action may or may not involve quotas.” (Ogbu, 1978, p.347)

Proposition Two: Affirmative action is a reverse discrimination. It is seen in this manner because Whites, for example, feel that affirmative action denies them opportunities. 

Pair Two

Proposition One: Assimilation is a means to achieve social integration. It takes place “when a group takes on the characteristics of the dominant culture, losing most of the characteristics of the original culture.” (Heuberger, 2001, p.32)

Proposition Two: Social integration can still be achieved through accommodation without assimilation. Accommodation without assimilation means minority participating in the dominant culture without abandoning their own culture and language (Gibson, 1991, quoted in Ogbu, 1991). 

====================================

Evaulation and Distribution of Points

Your work will be evaluated according to the stipulations provided in the attached evaluation rubric. Each group member will earn points only and only if he or she has contributed sufficiently to the project. This project is worth 10 points.

Evaluation Rubric for Final Product

Primary Traits Categories of Performance
  Excellent Good Poor Unacceptable
Language

The students were:

- Understandable

-Used appropriate language

The students were:

-Understandable

-Used appropriate language

The students were:

-Understandable

-Used inappropriate language

The students were:

-Not understandable

-Used inappropriate language
Organization

The students have:

-Clearly defined their position on the debate

- Allowed every group member a chance to make arguments

- Used ten minutes to develop their arguments. 

The students have:

- Clearly defined their position on the debate

- Allowed every group member a chance to make arguments

- Used ten minutes to develop their arguments. 

The students have:

-Ambiguously defined their position on the debate

- Allowed every group member a chance to make arguments

- Used ten minutes to develop their arguments. 

The students have:

- Ambiguously defined their position on the debate

- Allowed few group members chance to make arguments

- Used less than ten minutes to develop their arguments. 
Analysis

Students have:

 -Demonstrated excellent understanding of the following concepts: Affirmative action, Reverse discrimination, Assimilation, Social Integration, Accommodation, Accommodation without Assimilation, and Dominant culture. 

-Demonstrated logical integration of related concepts.

- Developed convincing arguments

Students have:

 -Demonstrated fair understanding of the following concepts: Affirmative action, Reverse discrimination, Assimilation, Social integration, Accommodation, Accommodation without assimilation, and Dominant culture. 

-Tried to integrate related concepts but with less clarity.

- Presented arguments few of which are less convincing

 Students have:

 -Demonstrated poor understanding of the following concepts: Affirmative action, Reverse discrimination, assimilation, Social integration, Accommodation, Accommodation without assimilation, and Dominant culture. 

-Tried to integrate related concepts with no clarity at all.

- Presented arguments most of which are less convincing

Students have:

 -Demonstrated no understanding of the following concepts: Affirmative action, Reverse discrimination, Assimilation, Social integration, Accommodation, Accommodation without assimilation, and Dominant culture. 

-Tried to integrate related concepts with no clarity at all.

- Arguments which make no sense

 

 

©2006 Miami University | 501 East High Street | Oxford, Ohio 45056 | 513.529.1809
Equal opportunity in education and employment | Privacy Statement
webmaster@muohio.edu | Accessibility problems? Contact odr@muohio.edu