Center For Writing Excellence

Bill McKenna

Long Writing Assignment for Students

2005 Workshop on Improving Student Writing

Center for Writing Excellence

Center for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching

 

INTRODUCTION FOR FACULTY TO THIS LONG WRITING ASSIGNMENT


Below is a major writing assignment for a course that I will be teaching for the first time in the fall, 2005 semester. The course title is “Cultural Differences: Worlds Apart?” and it is a seminar for first-year students offered as part of Miami’s new First Year Seminar program which began in the 2004-05 academic year. The courses offered in this program have a maximum of 20 students all of whom must be in their first year at Miami. The idea of this seminar program is to introduce students to challenging academic work at the beginning of their time at Miami. As originally envisioned, these courses were to be writing intensive and to have content that was related to the research of the instructor so that the course would engage the students in that work.

“Cultural Differences: Worlds Apart?” is a course that comes out of my current research and in a way I will be enlisting the students to help me advance this research by engaging them in a semester long conversation about the subject matter and also by helping me find writings on cultural differences.

The course concerns the epistemic dimension of life, that is, the way that processes of knowing at work in individual people may be involved in the formation and maintenance of basic beliefs that people hold and of the realities to which these beliefs relate. In particular it will concern the role that these epistemic processes play in forming the differences in beliefs and perceptions that are correlated with the generic differences that there are between people, differences such as those that stem from religious, gender, racial, political, national, and ethnic identities. One goal of the course is for students to learn and understand some philosophical concepts and theories that relate to the epistemic dimension of life, concepts and theories concerning such things as belief, truth, objectivity, and reality. A second goal is for them to learn how to use these concepts and theories in order to understand and think about these generic differences.

A third, more practical goal of the course is for students to learn how to apply the philosophical analysis of the epistemic dimension of life to devise ways that people could use to understand and cope with the conflicts that arise among them due to their generic differences. The assignment below is expressed in terms of this practical goal, but involves the other two as well. The first three objectives below flow directly out of the three goals. The fourth objective relates to the “critical thinking” liberal education goal for the course.

The assignment consists of a sequence of steps that include research to gather information, class presentation and discussion to elicit peer input, submission of paper to the instructor for review and comment, revision and submission of final version of paper.

LONG WRITING ASSIGNMENT FOR STUDENTS


This assignment involves the application of the philosophical concepts and theories of the course to understand and resolve a cultural conflict. Among the concepts and theories to be used are:

  • the theories of absolute and relative truth, and the pragmatic theory of truth
  • the concepts of belief, world, perspective, and objectivity

Objectives of the assignment are

  • to help you to understand some of the philosophical concepts an theories that relate to the epistemic dimension of life
  • to help you to learn how to use these philosophical concepts and theories to analyze a real life problem
  • to help you to learn how to use this analysis in order to help resolve a conflict
  • to help you to learn how to develop your thoughts

The first three objectives are in direct pursuit of the major goal of the course, which is to learn ways of using philosophical concepts and theories to understand and cope with the issues that arise for people because of their differences, differences that stem from their religious, gender, racial, political, national, ethnic and other identities. The fourth objective is related to the Miami Plan principle of critical thinking.

The project

At the beginning of the semester you identified a cultural conflict that was of interest to you. Your project is to discuss ways of resolving the conflict using the philosophical concepts and theories of the course. Your work will be done in several steps that will culminate in a paper that you will turn in near the end of the semester.

The steps

1. Research the conflict in order to learn the details of it.

2. Present the results of your research to the class and lead a discussion of ways you are thinking of analyzing the conflict using the concepts and theories of the course.

3. Write the paper in accordance with the specifications below and submit it to the instructor in or before the 12th week of the semester for his review and comments.

4. Revise the paper in accordance with the instructor’s comments and submit a final draft of the paper in the 14th week of the semester.

Paper specifications

The paper will consist of three parts:

Part one. Describe the conflict and analyze it in epistemic terms.

Part two. Explain how the conflict might be resolved using each of the theories of truth (absolute, relative, pragmatic) and the concepts of objectivity related to each of these theories. Put yourself in the position of a mediator guiding the parties of the conflict to a resolution.

Part three. Present your own thoughts about the three methods of resolution you have developed in part two. Do this in the form of an argument in which you state as your main claim which approach to resolving the conflict you think is preferable. To do this, first state your main claim in a concise sentence. Then state and develop grounds for your claim in order to persuade your readers to accept the claim. To “develop” the grounds, you may explain what they mean, give grounds for them, state warrants to help the reader understand the relevance of the grounds, and use other strategies listed on the handout “Developing your Thoughts.”

 

Evaluation

Your paper will be evaluated on the basis of the evidence it provides of:

  • sound understanding of the concepts and theories used
  • appropriateness of the methods of conflict resolution
  • use of multiple appropriate ways of developing your thought

Evaluation rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Quality of understanding of concepts and theories accurate understanding that goes beyond class material accurate understanding minor problems in understanding major problems in understanding
Quality of applications of   concepts and theories insightful applications that go beyond class presentations correct applications minor problems with applications major problems with applications
Appropriateness of method of inquiry method clearly follows from theory;  acute awareness of interpretative issues and obstacles to success method clearly follows from theory; some awareness of interpretative issues and obstacles to success some minor problems with connection of method and theory; little awareness of interpretative issues and obstacles to success some major problems with connection of method and theory; no awareness of interpretative issues or obstacles to success
Thought development uses many techniques to develop thoughts in ways that are useful and highly effective uses many ways to develop thoughts that are useful, and effective uses fewer ways to develop thoughts that are not always effective uses few ways to develop thoughts that are mostly ineffective

©2006 Miami University | 501 East High Street | Oxford, Ohio 45056 | 513.529.1809
Equal opportunity in education and employment | Privacy Statement
webmaster@muohio.edu | Accessibility problems? Contact odr@muohio.edu