
2006 AIS Conference Evaluation
Bridge-Building:
Connecting Hearts and Minds, Arts and Sciences, Teaching and Research, Academy
and Community
1 2 3 4 5
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent
__ I am an AIS member who often attends annual conferences.
__ I am a recent member who wants active contact with AIS.
__ The conference was an appropriate venue for me to offer a presentation.
__ I have a desire to become more familiar with the theory and practice of interdisciplinary/integrative studies.
__ I wished for an opportunity to network and learn about resources.
__ I specifically sought ideas for course content, pedagogy, and assessment.
__ I specifically sought ideas for program design, assessment, staffing and administration.
__ I specifically sought ideas for solving problems with interdisciplinary/integrative studies at my institution.
__ Connecting hearts and minds
__ Connecting arts and sciences
__ Connecting teaching and research
__ Connecting academy and community
__ Continuing concerns in interdisciplinary/integrative studies
Dazzling Great Good
Mixed reaction Disappointed
Learning about theory and practice.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Networking.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Learning about course content, pedagogy, and assessment.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Learning about program design, assessment, staffing, and administration.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Learning to solve problems in this area.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
8. Please comment on the following matters:
a. conference was well-organized
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
b.
conference website was effective
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
c.
registration procedures were effective
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
d.
pre-conference communications were effective
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
e.
materials/resources were appropriate
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
f.
(if you attended) the conference-sponsored workshop on CAL was of interest and
benefit
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
g.
(if you attended) the conference-sponsored workshop on syllabi was of interest
and benefit
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
h.
(if you attended) the Book Conversation plenary was of interest and benefit
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
i.
(if you attended) the Friday plenary (with Louis Dupre) was of interest and
benefit
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree Strongly
Agree
j.
(if you attended) the Saturday plenary (with ACTC) was of interest and benefit
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
k.
(if you participated) the GUIDEs
discussions were of interest and benefit
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
l.
(if you stayed in the Westin) the hotel accommodations were satisfying
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
m.
the meeting rooms provided by the hotel were satisfactory
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
n.
the food provided by the hotel was good
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
o.
the service provided by the hotel was good
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
p.
the Dinner Circles on Friday evening are a good idea
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
q.
the Entertainment Options on Saturday evening are a good idea
1 2 3 4 5
Strongly
Disagree Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
9. If you attended one or
both of the conference-sponsored workshops, please indicate what stood out for
you.
10. If you attended a GUIDEs
session on Saturday morning, please indicate what stood out for you.
11. On average, how would you
rate the quality of the sessions you attended? Please circle one.
Dazzling Great Good Mixed reaction Disappointed
13. Please comment here on
any sessions that stood out for you. It would be helpful to have them
identified by session number/letter or by presenter and/or title.
12. Overall, the level of presentation was (please circle one):
Too simple for my needs Too advanced for my needs Appropriate for my needs
15. Describe one thing that
you will do differently in your work as a result of one of the sessions you
attended. (And feel free to give more than one example, too.)
16. Comment on your level of
satisfaction/dissatisfaction with your own presentation and session.
17. Did you submit your
presentation for consideration for publication in Issues in Integrative
Studies? If not, why not.
18. What suggestions do you
have for changes/improvements in future AIS conferences?
19. What did you particularly
like about the Atlanta conference?
20. What suggestions do you
have for themes and issues we might pursue in future AIS conferences?
21. Would you (and your
institution) be interested in sponsoring the AIS conference at some future
time? If so, please be in touch with AIS about this.
22. If you have any final,
overall comments on any aspect of
the Atlanta conference (and AIS conferences in general), please make
them here.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR
ATTENDING THE CONFERENCE—AND FOR TAKING THE TIME TO EVALUATE THE
EXPERIENCE. WE APPRECIATE IT. SEE YOU NEXT YEAR.